The deck follows a problem-to-ask arc, paced so credibility compounds rather than front-loading the claim. It opens on stakes, not the product. Ageing drives 80% of disease and costs over $5 trillion a year, so the urgency lands before Bluebird is even named. Only once the problem is established does the deck state its claim and back it with a rats → humans → scale proof chain, turning a bold statement into a logical progression. From there it opens up the market, the moat, and the model.
We gave every headline number its own slide, so the 7 years, the $9 trillion, and the $25M each get a clean moment instead of competing for attention.